In this class, we have defined rhetoric as “a way of making
knowledge in the world,” but just what exactly is knowledge? And how is it
made?
From my understanding, knowledge is simply what you know to
be true. Knowledge is acquired through life’s experiences.
Plato described knowledge as being absolute, perfect,
infinite, and transcendent. He believed that rather than learning new things
(making new knowledge), we are simply remembering knowledge. Rather than
subscribing to the notion that Knowledge is transcendent, if we simply hold on
to the idea that knowledge is infinite and already defined in the universe,
then knowledge cannot be made, only discovered. Which raises another question – can knowledge be made?
From Barthes' "The Death of the Author," the idea was put forth
that the knowledge of a text is remade for each reader. I could argue, however,
that the varying perception from reader to reader is not new knowledge, but
different knowledges. What is absolutely true - the infinite, perfect,
idealized knowledge – is what knowledge actually is. But for each person, whom
are individually not realistically capable of this perfect knowledge, have
their own knowledges (or knowledgies?).
Which brings me to another question: Is knowledge dependent
on human existence? If we were all to suddenly disappear would knowledge exist? Would it matter?
If there was intelligent life on a planet for some time out somewhere
in space that existed long enough to record their own existence, but that
planet was consumed by a black hole, destroying all evidence of them being
there, did they matter? What does it mean to matter? Does anything matter?
If there was no conscious life to observe and validate the
existence of the universe, would it exist? Can the universe exist without life?
It would be pretty boring without it…
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.