The first trope Killingsworth discusses is identification/metaphor. Killingsworth defines metaphor as "a way of bringing together seemingly unlike things" (123). Metaphor is a "crucial way of thinking, an attempt to bridge conceptual gaps" (123) This trope is at the very heart of Sharon Daniel's Public Secrets. She brings together two different things, people in prison and people outside of prison, as a way to show the injustice of our judicial system and how awful our prisons can be. Through this project, the audience is able to see the misunderstanding of inmates that happens by the public, the people on the outside of the prison walls. She uses this project to "bridge the conceptual gaps" seen in the ways the public views prisons. There is also a clear irony going on in Public Secrets. Killingsworth says that the trope of irony "involves inversions and reversals. It turns meanings and expectations upside down. It often involves saying one thing and meaning another” (131). You can see this in the title. Public means concerning the people as a whole and existing in open view. If something is public it is open to everyone. The word secret deals with keeping some information quite or not telling everyone. The title is ironic in that the two words used in the title are essentially opposites. The titles of the different sections show irony too. Inside/Outside, Bare-life/Human-life, and Public Secrets/ Utopia are all "inversions and reversals" and mean different things.
Public Secrets can be interpreted through heteroglossia. Killingsworth is not simply narrating her findings but allows many inmates and individuals to narrate their own stories. In "Discourse in the Novel", Bakhtin talks about heteroglossia and says the it is another's voice coming through the author's text as a way to "express authorial intentions but in a refracted way" (324). Daniels is using the words, stories and voices of others to support her claim about the injustice that is our prison and judicial system. Tropes and heteroglossia are used by Daniel to prove her point and support her claim.
Works Cited:
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. “Discourse in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: U of Texas P, 1981. 259-331.
Killingsworth, M. Jimmie. “Appeal Through Tropes.” Appeals in Modern Rhetoric: An Ordinary- Language Approach. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP, 2005. 121-135.
Does "persuasive power" really mean that the tropes can be left to interpretation? Is interpretation something that can be persuaded by what is existing in the text, or does the trope enhance language and create persuasiveness like you said? You also said that Daniel uses this project to "bridge the conceptual gaps" seen in the ways the public views prisons. Do you think that in some ways she took away the stigma of actually being in prison by not linking the women inside to their crime. Some of them mentioned what they were incarcerated for, but Daniel never makes a point to say "this person has this many years for this reason". Do you think that this is intentional in order to create the bridge between conceptual gaps? Do you think that people have this stigma about prisons and can't actually bridge the gap when that is in the back of their mind? The people incarcerated actually did something wrong, whether they were being treated unfairly or not. Does their crime really define who they are and how they should be treated and live for the rest of their life? The inversions and reversals of the titles in this hypertext essay offer us a guideline to how we should think about the essay. Do you think Daniel started this project with the same intention as the outcome? Did the heterglossia of the different voices in the novel create her claim that there is injustice in our prison and judicial system? Do you think anyone in our class changed their view on the judicial and prison system because of this hypertext essay?
ReplyDelete