When dealing with the concept of immediacy, questions are raised about virtual reality. Immediacy is also defined as a “disappearing act”. (315) The purpose of virtual reality and immediacy is to put the computer-generated image in the viewer’s face. The graphic puts the person in a stationary point to view the graphic generated world that appears to be around them. The experience of virtual reality is also called into question. In what ways is virtual reality necessary? What does it add or create in reality of life. Perpetual immediacy is experience without mediation. What this means is that the virtual reality will diminish “the mediating presence of the computer and its interface.” (316) The actual devices that are used to create the virtual reality are taken away, disregarded, or unapparent.
According to Bolter and Grusin, this work of immediacy can also be seen in digital graphics that are two and three-dimensional viewed on a screen. (316) Digital graphics are changing as technology changes. Any photograph, video, or image can be manipulated with computer graphics to create other meaning. There is a desire for immediacy in film created by the audience. (316) This means that as an audience, we really want to feel like we are there and that everything happening in the film is real. There is more of a need to make the interface of computer programs and virtual reality to be “natural”. (316) Scientists and researchers are attempting to create “interfaceless” interfaces in which no outside electronics, or other use items will be used. (317) There is also a need for transparency that erases the mediums used to create the virtual reality. Virtual reality is a new creation that takes us out of history and into the future of film and graphics altogether. Computer graphics are the latest expression of the desire for immediacy, even though it is influenced by earlier traditions. Images are able to be recreated easier, and audiences are less likely to know whether or not the image is reality or not reality. Bolter and Grusin say that “even if we cannot always tell synthesized images from photographs, we can distinguish the somewhat different strategies that painting and photography have adopted in striving for immediacy…” (321) This means that as an audience, we are able to distinguish the effects of immediacy, in some ways this can be described as the opposite of immediacy of the immediacy if I were to put a name to it. As an audience, we can tell that there is some sense of the photograph, image, or other kind of virtual reality that makes it virtual and not an actual reality.
Bolter and Grusin say that computer graphics are
expressed in mathematical terms to create the perfect sense. (322) I agree that
this is correct and that computer-generated graphics often use a lot of
mathematics in programs and the creation of the virtual realities. (322) I also
disagree in some ways because I think that computer graphics are expressed in
terms of ethos, pathos, and logos. The computer-generated graphics look for a
reaction of one or more of these three to what is created in the virtual
reality. How an image, film, or something else affects the viewer defines how
the reality will be created or what it will become. The experts on computer
graphics that say “they are striving to achieve ‘photorealism’… to make their
synthetic images indistinguishable from photographs”, are also in some ways
striving to affect the ethos, logos, and pathos of the audience. The more realistic the photograph looks to
the viewer’s eye, the more they will believe the realistic qualities of the
photographs. Bolter and Grusin bring up
the idea that the synthetic image is another medium, rather than the computer
imitating an external reality. The other medium is a manipulated photograph
presenting its own contents, rather than comparing it to another literal photograph
of the same thing and picking apart the differences between the two. Each piece
of equipment involved in the manipulation and creation of the photograph is
another added mediation taking away the actual “realness” of the reality to
re-create the reality in a digitally manipulated form. The virtual realities
that involve helmets that the viewer wears to experience it use many different
technological devices to make the experience seem more “real”. There is a
tracker that tracks the perspective of the viewer’s head as that person tilts
and turns their head. (325) The person can look down, see the floor, look up,
see the sky, turn right, see the glance over and the new view that they
encounter. Bolter and Grusin quote Rheingold’s claim, “[Virtual Reality]
technology is taking people beyond and through the display screen into virtual
worlds.” (325) In a lot of ways, I agree with this, but in a literal sense,
these words are still untrue. No one is actually taken anywhere into a virtual
reality. The virtual realities and systems that help them work are just
breaking down the barriers between real and fake-real. No person is ever taken
through the display screen, they are still physically there viewing the screen
as the world around them.
Rheingold and Bolter and Grusin talk a lot about
video games and interactive interfaces but this also reminds me of the movie Spy Kids. I’m not sure which number
movie this was, but in one of the newer Spy
Kids movies, the kids are asked to go into the video game to save someone.
I’m not sure of the actual plotline as I haven’t seen this movie in quite some
time, but the whole point is that they are physically in a lab or large office
space, but their mind and physical appearance is transported into the game with
other players. They move freely through the world as if it were a reality, even
though the world is designed as a fake, futuristic, dark world with obstacles
and things to do as you move through the levels of the game. The movie creates
this immediacy for the characters that is unrealistic to the technology that we
have access to now in the world, to the extent of my knowledge. The movie
itself adds another layer of remediation with the film. The scenes in which the
characters are in the video game make the viewer, usually children, feel as if
they are a part of the game with them. The movie takes you with the on the
journey as they fight off little minion things and play in battles in giant
robot costumes with other players. Even this scene itself adds another layer.
While in the virtual reality, characters must go to the battle arena and choose
a transformer size robot to be their battle robot. To control the robot, they
must get onto a platform that replaces the head of the robot. The robot will
copy every move that the character makes with their body. For example, if she
were to kick, the robot would kick. If she were to punch, the robot would
punch. If that character’s robot were to take a punch, the character would fall
down on the platform and have to work to stand back up. These two layers take
the characters of the movie out of their actual reality. The computer graphics
that were needed to create a film like this were probably very intricate. The
whole video game world along with many of the stunts would have to have been
digitally created with computer graphics.
Thanks for your insight into immediacy, Taylor.
ReplyDeleteI too found the "disappearing act," to be a great analogy when describing immediacy. It seems to me, that it can be defined rather simply as 'bringing the audience into direct and total involvement with the message,' in effect, disappearing the medium that usually is the barrier between the 'audience' and 'message.'
By message I mean what is being conveyed (could be an entire virtual reality), and by audience I mean the person(s) experiencing the message.
I feel that our technology has been working towards the ideal of immediacy, especially within the digital age. As we move closer to virtual reality, we find that we become more and more immersed in the material presented to us - like when you go to a movie theater and become so involved in the story and the sights and sounds that you, for some time, are nearly totally immersed in the message.
This may be going a little too deep, but I feel like this concept can be extended into how language and social constructs create the 'virtual reality,' in which we live. By our nature, we have moved to label everything with words, symbols, etc. that correlate to logical explanations, removing the wonder of the world. We, in a way, desensitize ourselves to the wonder and beauty of the world by labeling things and logically rationalizing them. Like as a with a child, if a bird where to fly into a room, that bird is a miracle - it is matter, born from the belly of a star, that managed to organize itself into a living organism that can fly, see, think (?), feel, etc, but then when that child learns, oh, it's just a bird, the reality, 'the magic' is sterilized. Language is the medium through which we virtualize reality.
I also liked how you linked the concept to spy kids, as that was a great example of virtual reality – but I think the matrix would also been a great example